Show recent news

Latest News

  • Casa Musica and WDSF Set the Stage for Another Year of Rhythmic Collaboration

    This long-standing collaboration, launched in 2015, has seen Casa musica play an integral role in enhancing the musical backdrop of WDSF competitions.

    28/03/2024 read more ...
  • WDSF Extends Sponsorship Agreement with BD Dance for Third Consecutive Year

    Beyond a conventional sponsorship, the partnership embodies a shared vision of nurturing the DanceSport community and providing dancers with optimal footwear for outstanding performances.

    21/03/2024 read more ...
  • WDSF unveils lineup for 2024 GrandSlam Series

    This year, the GrandSlam circuit promises to be more exhilarating than ever, with a total of five electrifying events spanning across the globe.

    05/03/2024 read more ...
  • Launch of WDSF Education Programme: Empowering National Member Bodies

    Discover how the WDSF Education Programme empowers National Member Bodies with high-level educational resources, fostering growth and excellence in DanceSport. Learn more!

    20/02/2024 read more ...
  • WDSF World Choreographic Championship 2024

    The Choreographic discipline, which began to take root within numerous National Member Bodies (NMBs) some years ago, has since achieved notable recognition among various countries.

    05/02/2024 read more ...
  • Thank you for voting!

    The World Games Athlete of the Year 2023 election has been closed and we are happy to announce that our candidate couple for the title, Marius-Andrei Balan and Khrystyna Moshenska (GER) reached the podium!

    31/01/2024 read more ...
Archives

Officials' Brief 26/02/2013

2.0 – In A Nutshell

The Judging System 2.0 limits the Components that are to be graded by the adjudicators to four only. It acknowledges that two Components cover technical aspects of the performance and that the other two assess the latter’s artistic qualities.

  • Technical Quality – TQ
  • Movement to Music – MM
  • Partnering Skill – PS
  • Choreography and Presentation – CP

While the panel consisted of nine adjudicators grading all Components at all times previously, System 2.0 calls for twelve adjudicators on the panel to be divided into four groups – and for each group of three to assess only one Component. The Components will be randomly assigned to the three adjudicators immediately prior to each dance.

Grading continues to be on the established scale from 1 (Very Poor) to 10 (Outstanding) and 0.5 fractions can still be awarded for further differentiation. In computing the score (average) for each Component between the three grades given by the assigned group of adjudicators, the lowest and the highest grade count only 50% towards the average.

The actual “workload” of the adjudicators is reduced in terms of assessment as well as the mechanics of entering values on the touch-screen terminals. Only one Component needs to be considered at one time, only one value needs to be entered after the assessment is done. This, in turn, leads to the Judging System 2.0 being applicable for group dances as well. Even in a group dance with up to eight couples on the floor, and the duration of just over two minutes per dance, an adjudicator has the necessary time required to grade each couple individually.

That allows for the System 2.0 to be used from the quarterfinal stages in a competition – and for group dances to be performed in the final too. Two out of the five dances in the final are group dances now. And the three solo dances are selected in a random draw. The order in which the five dances are performed in the final is Solo-Solo-Group-Solo-Group.

8fFl45VT3-k|The Judging System 2.0 | WDSF Sports Department
AAVUdBJQBc4|Judging System 2.0 Applied | WDSF Sports Department